tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-57794242009-02-21T01:35:37.502-06:00OnePageLewishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02684503566543431986noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5779424.post-1062963913004190452003-09-07T14:45:00.000-05:002005-05-08T16:59:37.360-05:00A Powerful Argument for Attacking Standard Form Contracts -- "Or" is always ambiguous.If you are fighting a form contract, look for an "or." It is fertile ground to make the interpretation of the contract a jury question.In SouthTrust Bank v. Copeland One, L.L.C., 2003 WL 22064062 (Ala. 2003), the Supreme Court struck a blow against the inartfully drafted "form contract." It is a welcome opinion for lawyers who can articulate the many potential ambiguities in ordinary language. Lewishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02684503566543431986noreply@blogger.com